| Legislative： |
Seven articles promulgated by
Environmental Protection Administration Order
Huan-Pao-Shu-Tu-Tzu No. 0950051822 on July 4,2006. |
| Content： |
|
These Standards are determined pursuant to Article 6, Paragraph 1 of the Drinking Water
Management Statutes.
|
|
An applicant submitting a drinking water source quality or water treatment improvement plan
(herein referred to as an improvement plan) must possess one
of the following qualifications:
|
|
II. Management unit of community-installed public water supply
equipment.
|
|
III. Management unit of a small water treatment facility.
|
|
When submitting a improvement plan, the following information must be submitted in decuplicate
to the relevant industry competent authority, which shall forward
the information to the central
competent authority for review, and submit copies to the special
municipality, county, or city
competent authority with jurisdiction:
|
|
II. Current state of water source quality and inspection report.
|
|
III. Content of improvement work.
|
|
IV. Time needed for plan.
|
|
VI. Expected water quality after improvement.
|
|
VII. Water quality monitoring plan.
|
|
VIII. Response measures to be adopted during the improvement
period.
|
|
IX. Expected improvement plan timetable.
|
|
X. Matters requiring cooperation of other relevant agencies.
|
|
In the foregoing paragraph, industry competent authority refers to the central water conservancy
competent authority in the case of tap water, and the special
municipality, county or city government in
the case of a small water
|
|
treatment facility or community-installed public water supply.
|
|
The central competent authority may convene experts, scholars, and relevant agencies or
organizations to review a improvement plan.
|
|
The central competent authority shall review an improvement plan application in accordance with
the following regulations:
|
|
I. If the submitted documents or materials are incomplete or
do not comply with regulations, after
being notified to make corrections within a limited time period, the applicant fails to make
corrections, or makes incomplete corrections, the application shall be rejected. However, those
who request the central competent authority to approve an extension with legitimate cause before
the deadline shall not be subject to this restriction.
|
|
II. Inspection shall be completed within 60 days when the required
documents and data have been
submitted in full.
|
|
III. The number of days for making corrections for each item
shall not be added to the review period.
|
|
After the central competent authority has reviewed the improvement work content, schedule,
water quality monitoring plan, expected water quality after
improvement, response measures, expected
improvement plan timetable, and other relevant information in
an improvement plan, the project can
continue to serve as a source of drinking water only if the
central competent authority acknowledges
that the plan can improve water quality. If review by the central
competent authority fails to confirm
improvement, the application shall be rejected.
|
|
Improvement shall be implemented in accordance with the improvement plan after application is
reviewed an approved in the foregoing paragraph. A plan implementation
progress form must be filled
out every three months and submitted to the central competent
authority for future reference; copies
shall be sent to the special municipality, county, or city competent
authority with jurisdiction.
|
|
These Regulations shall take effect from the date of promulgation.
|
|